Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01n870zt56q
Title: Waning Growth Impact of Real Exchange Rate: Why a Real Undervaluation Has Never Spurred Economic Growth in Nigeria
Authors: Akosa, Carrington
Advisors: Wantchekon, Leonard
Department: Princeton School of Public and International Affairs
Certificate Program: African Studies Program
Class Year: 2018
Abstract: With the pressure from international multilateral organizations, like the IMF and the World Bank, for Nigeria to devalue its currency in order to experience a stronger economic growth and Nigeria's subsequent adamancy to obey; I explore the relationship between real exchange rate and growth, bearing in mind that a nominal currency devaluation or appreciation has a real effect. I address the following questions to uncover if Nigeria's defiance is justified: What is the relationship between real exchange rate and economic growth? Does this relationship hold true for developing nations ‐ specifically defined, in my research, as the very poorest ‐ ? Finally, if there is a relationship, does this relationship apply to countries dependent on natural resources? My research presents four main facts: ( i ) there is a general negative relationship between real exchange rate and growth (ie. a real undervaluation stimulates growth while a real overvaluation hampers growth); ( ii ) this relationship is very strong for richer countries and very weak for poorer countries; ( iii ) this relationship fades away in the later time period considered in my research (2005‐2016); ( iv ) this relationship never holds true for countries dependent on natural resources. Given these facts, I explore the channels through which real exchange rate could affect economic growth in richer countries but not in poorer countries or resource‐dependent countries. By building a simple analytical model, I find that an increase in exports is the most likely channel through which real exchange rate impacts economic growth in richer countries. A real undervaluation leads to an increase in exports for richer countries but not for poorer countries because of the difference in export demand elasticity ‐ richer countries have a price elastic demand for their exports while poorer countries have a price inelastic demand for their exports. Furthermore, I suggest that the decline in export and economic growth impact of real exchange rate in recent times is due to a possible shift in export demand elasticity, from price elastic to price inelastic. Finally, I apply these facts on Nigeria to conclude that Nigeria is justified in holding off against undervaluation as long as the benefits of her actions outweigh the costs.
URI: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01n870zt56q
Type of Material: Princeton University Senior Theses
Language: en
Appears in Collections:Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, 1929-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AKOSA-CARRINGTON-THESIS.pdf440.33 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.