Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01n870zt56q
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Wantchekon, Leonard | - |
dc.contributor.author | Akosa, Carrington | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-14T19:38:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-14T19:38:53Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2018-04-09 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-08-14 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01n870zt56q | - |
dc.description.abstract | With the pressure from international multilateral organizations, like the IMF and the World Bank, for Nigeria to devalue its currency in order to experience a stronger economic growth and Nigeria's subsequent adamancy to obey; I explore the relationship between real exchange rate and growth, bearing in mind that a nominal currency devaluation or appreciation has a real effect. I address the following questions to uncover if Nigeria's defiance is justified: What is the relationship between real exchange rate and economic growth? Does this relationship hold true for developing nations ‐ specifically defined, in my research, as the very poorest ‐ ? Finally, if there is a relationship, does this relationship apply to countries dependent on natural resources? My research presents four main facts: ( i ) there is a general negative relationship between real exchange rate and growth (ie. a real undervaluation stimulates growth while a real overvaluation hampers growth); ( ii ) this relationship is very strong for richer countries and very weak for poorer countries; ( iii ) this relationship fades away in the later time period considered in my research (2005‐2016); ( iv ) this relationship never holds true for countries dependent on natural resources. Given these facts, I explore the channels through which real exchange rate could affect economic growth in richer countries but not in poorer countries or resource‐dependent countries. By building a simple analytical model, I find that an increase in exports is the most likely channel through which real exchange rate impacts economic growth in richer countries. A real undervaluation leads to an increase in exports for richer countries but not for poorer countries because of the difference in export demand elasticity ‐ richer countries have a price elastic demand for their exports while poorer countries have a price inelastic demand for their exports. Furthermore, I suggest that the decline in export and economic growth impact of real exchange rate in recent times is due to a possible shift in export demand elasticity, from price elastic to price inelastic. Finally, I apply these facts on Nigeria to conclude that Nigeria is justified in holding off against undervaluation as long as the benefits of her actions outweigh the costs. | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | Waning Growth Impact of Real Exchange Rate: Why a Real Undervaluation Has Never Spurred Economic Growth in Nigeria | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2018 | en_US |
pu.department | Princeton School of Public and International Affairs | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
pu.contributor.authorid | 960956569 | - |
pu.certificate | African Studies Program | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, 1929-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
AKOSA-CARRINGTON-THESIS.pdf | 440.33 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.