Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/99999/fk4ht43q88
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBeitzStilz, CharlesAnna R.
dc.contributor.authorChan, Shuk Ying
dc.contributor.otherPolitics Department
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-04T13:27:02Z-
dc.date.created2021-01-01
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/99999/fk4ht43q88-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation develops a view of “postcolonial global justice” as grounded on an ideal of socialequality. While many colonized peoples attained formal sovereignty in mid-to-late 20th century, deepening globalization has continued to draw charges of neocolonialism. Drawing on the political thought of Third World anticolonial thinkers, I investigate how structures of colonial injustice continue to manifest in global politics, and what principles of global justice they call for. While there is a longstanding tendency to read anticolonial thinkers as nationalists whose main concern was defending sovereignty for the nation-state, and/or as forerunners of postcolonial critique who eschewed talk of moral ideals, I shift our focus to a second strand of anticolonialism by engaging closely with key writings of Jawaharlal Nehru, Kwame Nkrumah, Amílcar Cabral, Frantz Fanon, and Aimé Césaire. I argue that an important set of themes within anticolonial thought can be theorized as a critique of relations of inequality, and decolonization understood as the construction of egalitarian global and domestic relations. This second strand of anticolonialism, which grounds what I call the egalitarian face of decolonization, pushes us to rethink decolonization as a project of global integration on terms of equality, and has radical implications for thinking about global justice today. Based on this egalitarian reconstruction of anticolonialism, I develop a philosophical account of postcolonial global justice as social equality. I bring this account to bear on three different aspects of contemporary global politics, and explore the distinctive reforms needed to dismantle global hierarchies. First, engaging with Nkrumah’s work on neocolonialism, I take up the question of economic decolonization by focusing on international investment. Second, I turn to the question of cultural decolonization by focusing on the global trade in cultural goods. Engaging with Aimé Césaire and Amílcar Cabral’s critiques of cultural imperialism, I argue that decolonizing cultural globalization can be understood as overcoming a global racial hierarchy inherited from colonial discourses of civilization. Finally, engaging with Nehru’s writings on global governance, I take up the question of political decolonization by focusing on (un)democratic decision-making within institutions that regulate interactions between agents at the global level.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu>catalog.princeton.edu</a>
dc.subjectAnticolonial thought
dc.subjectColonialism
dc.subjectDecolonization
dc.subjectGlobal justice
dc.subjectPostcolonial justice
dc.subjectSocial equality
dc.subject.classificationPolitical science
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophy
dc.titlePostcolonial Global Justice
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)
pu.embargo.lift2023-09-30-
pu.embargo.terms2023-09-30
pu.date.classyear2021
pu.departmentPolitics
Appears in Collections:Politics

Files in This Item:
This content is embargoed until 2023-09-30. For questions about theses and dissertations, please contact the Mudd Manuscript Library. For questions about research datasets, as well as other inquiries, please contact the DataSpace curators.


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.