Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/99999/fk48h02w56
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Rogerson, Richard | |
dc.contributor.author | Sorg-Langhans, George Leopold | |
dc.contributor.other | Economics Department | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-04T13:26:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-04T13:26:37Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-01-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/99999/fk48h02w56 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation consists of three independent chapters on questions surrounding household dynamics and machine learning methods developed to address them. In the first chapter, which is co-authored with Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde, Galo Nuno, and Maximilian Vogler, we develop a deep-learning algorithm to globally solve high-dimensional dynamic programming problems that arise in macroeconomic models. This approach allows us to address household dynamics in a rich environment driven by both aggregate and idiosyncratic uncertainty. We evaluate our methodology in a standard neoclassical growth model and then demonstrate its power in two high-dimensional applications -- a model of dynamic capital allocation and a model of migration and labor mobility. In the second chapter I propose a new machine learning approach to understanding consumption insurance of households, a central issue in the context of household dynamics. I draw on a state-of-the-art machine learning method, gradient boosted trees, to predict consumption in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. With the resulting panel data set in hand, I adopt Blundell, Pistaferri, and Preston's (2008) assumptions about the underlying permanent-transitory income process, which allows me to estimate insurance coefficients. Importantly, I find qualitative and quantitative differences to their insurance predictions. In the third chapter, which is co-authored with Riccardo Cioffi, and Maximilian Vogler, we investigate how different theories of wealth inequality interact with important policy experiments. To this end, we calibrate four models, each incorporating a different inequality-generating channel emphasized in the theoretical literature, and compare their predictions regarding different policy experiments. We find stark quantitative and qualitative differences in predictions across channels for a given policy experiment, indicating that analyzing their relative importance is crucial to our understanding of wealth inequality. | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Princeton, NJ : Princeton University | |
dc.relation.isformatof | The Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu>catalog.princeton.edu</a> | |
dc.subject | Consumption Insurance | |
dc.subject | Economics | |
dc.subject | Household Dynamics | |
dc.subject | Machine Learning | |
dc.subject.classification | Economics | |
dc.title | Essays on Machine Learning Methods and Household Dynamics | |
dc.type | Academic dissertations (Ph.D.) | |
pu.date.classyear | 2021 | |
pu.department | Economics | |
Appears in Collections: | Economics |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
SorgLanghans_princeton_0181D_13824.pdf | 3.28 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.