Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/99999/fk44f37q33
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorConley, Dalton
dc.contributor.authorUrbina Julio, Daniela Rosario
dc.contributor.otherSociology Department
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-10T17:14:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-10T17:14:54Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/99999/fk44f37q33-
dc.description.abstractIn the last few decades, Latin American women had dramatically increased their educational attainment and economic position relative to men. However, these transformations unfolded amidst the prevalence of cultural norms---including gendered views of the division of labor and hypergamy ideals in marital selection---that are in tension with the reduction of these gender gaps. This dissertation examines whether, under these contextual conditions, increases in women's status reduce long-standing gender inequalities in families. To do so, I focus on two policies driving some of these transformations in the Latin American context––conditional cash transfer programs and educational expansion reforms. The first chapter examines conditional cash transfers as a case where women’s economic position is drastically improved via welfare payments. In particular, I analyze Mexico’s Progresa program, which provided cash transfers to low-income women following an experimental design. I find that these payments shifted husbands’ attitudes towards a more equitable division of labor and improved wives’ autonomy. Notably, these transfers did not generate a gender backlash response among treated families––such as pushing women further into unpaid labor––as gender-based theories posited. In the second chapter, I analyze whether increases in women’s schooling reduce gender asymmetries in marriage in Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru. I show that in two dimensions of union formation---marriage entry and marital selection---status differences between men and women prevail as gender gaps in education are reduced. My results demonstrate that highly educated women are less likely to get married in all countries and that marriage propensities favoring hypergamy persist across cohorts, confirming the endurance of gender asymmetrical norms. In my last chapter, I inspect whether mass education reforms increase women’s autonomy and decision-making––a classic argument among demographers and development scholars. By leveraging the timing of compulsory schooling reforms in Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru, I show that while education is a means of empowerment for most women, further schooling is an ineffective tool to increase female autonomy among rural and indigenous populations. I argue these results are explained by changes in the selection into schooling and the effects of women's education on marriage.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> catalog.princeton.edu </a>
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectFamily
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjectQuantitative Methodology
dc.subjectSocial Demography
dc.subject.classificationSociology
dc.subject.classificationDemography
dc.titleWhen the Tables Turn: Marriage and Gender Inequality in Latin America
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)
Appears in Collections:Sociology

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
UrbinaJulio_princeton_0181D_13675.pdf3.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.