Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01z603r087v
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorCenteno, Miguel-
dc.contributor.advisorLevin, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, Allanna-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-07T13:15:15Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-07T13:15:15Z-
dc.date.created2016-04-01-
dc.date.issued2016-07-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01z603r087v-
dc.description.abstractConceptually speaking, resilience and societal security share much of the same underpinnings when it comes to the conceptualization of change. I would like to apply ecological examples of resilience to this concept of state capacity. In other words, can biological systems provide illustrations and insights into how change may not always be threatening to the system’s sustainability? I argue that such comparisons are in fact valid to make, even though ecological systems and states are seemingly distinct. In subsequent chapters, I will make claims that question the validity of nationalist arguments, gaining insights from socio-ecological systems. This thesis is primarily motivated by claims put forth in Samuel Huntington’s Who Are We?, many of which I seek to refute.en_US
dc.format.extent78 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleSTRANGERS ON THE EDGE: HOW ECOLOGY CAN INFORM CHANGE IN STATE SYSTEMSen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 1992-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Daniels_Lana_Thesis.pdf783.57 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.