Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01xs55mf514
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSims, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Charles-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-08T16:04:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-08T16:04:31Z-
dc.date.created2016-04-13-
dc.date.issued2016-07-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01xs55mf514-
dc.description.abstractSkepticism over the validity of o cial Chinese GDP gures has been widespread among the media, investment professionals, and academic researchers in recent years. This study seeks to rigorously analyze the basis for such claims by performing static factor analysis with estimated idiosyncratic components on various Chinese macroeconomic time series. We examine the data at three timescales: log-levels, annual growth rates, and quarterly growth rates. Our results indicate that the reliability of published GDP for measuring underlying business activity depends signi cantly on the time frame - GDP is highly relevant for long time horizons, which include the log-levels and annual growth rates, but is much less relevant for the short-term, which includes quarterly growth rates.en_US
dc.format.extent131 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleThe Reliability of Chinese GDP: Measuring Underlying Business Activity with Static Factor Modelsen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentEconomicsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Economics, 1927-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Implicit Bias Training and Servicio Social: A Comparative Analysis of Medical School Curricula in the United States and Mexico1.15 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.