Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01xs55mc16r
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPatten, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorGlover, Robin-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-15T15:19:19Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-15T15:19:19Z-
dc.date.created2013-04-03-
dc.date.issued2013-07-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01xs55mc16r-
dc.description.abstractThe 1844 Manuscripts are not explicitly amoral and contain vivid accounts of grotesque effects of inequality. The Manuscripts are a popular origin for a Marxian account of justice. I motivate the conclusion that Marx's theory of alienation is a theory of how and why cognitive dissonance occurs in capitalist societies.en_US
dc.format.extent41 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleAlienation as Cognitive Dissonance: Reconciling the Normative Agnosticism of Marx’s Mature Writings with the 1844 Manuscriptsen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2013en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
dc.rights.accessRightsWalk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the <a href=http://mudd.princeton.edu>Mudd Manuscript Library</a>.-
pu.mudd.walkinyes-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
GloverRobinThesis.pdf333.93 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.