Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ww72bb50n
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Lisaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:56:36Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:56:36Z-
dc.date.issued1995-07-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationEconomic Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 1, January 1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ww72bb50n-
dc.description.abstractImplementing the ultimatum game experimentally in Indonesia makes it possible to raise the stakes to three times the monthly expenditure of the average participant. Contrary to predictions in the literature, the results show no evidence of approaching the sub-game perfect, selfish outcomes. Responders seem to be just as willing to reject a given percentage offer at high stakes as at low stakes, and Proposers make slightly less selfish offers as the stakes increase.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 345en_US
dc.subjectexperimental economicsen_US
dc.subjectultimatum gameen_US
dc.subjectlarge stakesen_US
dc.titleRaising the Stakes in the Ultimatum Game: Experimental Evidence From Indonesiaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
345.pdf1.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.