Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01wp988j838
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDiMaggio, Paul Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Amiren_US
dc.contributor.otherSociology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-29T18:04:21Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-29T18:04:21Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01wp988j838-
dc.description.abstractSocial systems of classification have always captivated the sociological imagination. Collectively agreed-upon ways of sorting the world into different categorical boxes - such as those distinguishing people by ethnicity or occupation - play important roles in sustaining social order. Yet while sociologists have thoroughly investigated how divisions reified by social categories have concrete consequences for the unequal distribution of resources, a central question remains largely unanswered: how do these categories emerge? This dissertation tries to address this question by comparatively investigating the classificatory dynamics in two social network websites: an online music community in which individuals share their musical compilations, and a financial investment website where users exchange information about their investment portfolios. Existing sociological scholarship suggests a co-evolutionary mechanism whereby category systems are inter-subjectively coordinated through interaction, shaping the patterns of interpersonal exchange which sustain them. This dissertation dissects this proposition analytically, translates it operationally, and tests it empirically. I argue that, whether deciding which music to listen to or what stocks to invest in, the categorical distinctions people use to make sense of the world are inherently related to the people with whom they interact. My results demonstrate a persistent overlap between structures of interpersonal interaction and categorical meaning: when people interact in clearly bounded groups, they also tend to draw stronger categorical boundaries. Change emerges on the seams connecting these groups. As I demonstrate, when an artist is listened to or a stock invested in by people outside the group they are associated with, these objects' meanings begin to transform. Status plays an important role in providing incentives and rewards for people to defy categorical boundaries. Though there are obvious differences between musical consumption and financial investment, this dissertation is concerned with highlighting the fundamentally similar ways in which meaning is socially constituted in both.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectCategoriesen_US
dc.subjectCultureen_US
dc.subjectFinanceen_US
dc.subjectMusicen_US
dc.subjectNetworksen_US
dc.subjectOnlineen_US
dc.subject.classificationSociologyen_US
dc.titleWHERE DO SOCIAL CATEGORIES COME FROM? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE INTERACTION AND CATEGORICAL EMERGENCE IN MUSIC AND FINANCEen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Sociology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Goldberg_princeton_0181D_10128.pdf4.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.