Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vd66w274j
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorEdin, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorAririguzoh, Franklin-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T13:02:58Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-14T13:02:58Z-
dc.date.created2019-04-02-
dc.date.issued2019-08-14-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vd66w274j-
dc.description.abstractThe thesis is centered around an exploration of the disparities in the political tools afforded to 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations. It begins with a brief introduction to the non-profit designations and to the tax and political benefits attached to each organization type. It continues with a comparative case study juxtaposing two extreme manifestations of some of the legislative mechanism available to the separate classifications. Discussion on the limitations of the study precede takeaways on the vast difference in the mechanisms that 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations can exploit. These conclusions are framed in the context of recent events further expanding the gap in political access between the two non-profit classifications. The thesis concludes with its findings and recommendations on topics of interest for further research.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.title501(c)(3) OR 501(c)(4)? AN EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY ON THE POLITICAL MECHANISMS OF TWO NON-PROFIT DESIGNATIONSen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2019en_US
pu.departmentPrinceton School of Public and International Affairsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid961184154-
Appears in Collections:Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, 1929-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ARIRIGUZOH-FRANKLIN-THESIS.pdf329.54 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.