Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vd66w005p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBoyer, M. Christineen_US
dc.contributor.authorImperiale, Alicia A.en_US
dc.contributor.otherArchitecture Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05T19:45:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-05T08:06:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vd66w005p-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation reconsiders "organic architecture" in Italy in the 1960s by interrogating Bruno Zevi's use of the term in his <italic>Towards an Organic Architecture</italic> (<italic>Verso un'architettura organica</italic>) and examines the work of Italian architect Rinaldo Semino (1937-) to posit an alternate definition for the trope, "organic." Semino's work focused on the interaction of small, prefabricated units ("cells") as components that would aggregate into larger architectural structures--a methodology that prizes a simple rationality derived from the study of natural forms. I employ the term "alternate organics" to distinguish this particular method and design approach--which derives its core meaning from a careful study of rule based, or computational processes seen in nature--from the term's more general use that relies upon a fixed final form or style. Semino is, thus, a lens into others working in a similar manner, and a means to grasp a methodology that coalesced in postwar Italian architecture, which began with the economic miracle of 1958-63 and ended with the economic crisis of 1973. It was a period of startling changes in postwar Italy. Population boom and mass migration from the countryside and small towns to large cities created crises and reactions that were much discussed in the 1950s. By the 1960s, these discussions had clustered into the theme of the <italic>grande numero</italic> ("the Greater Number"). This dissertation considers some reactions to the <italic>grande numero</italic>, such as national, corporate, and international competitions that stimulated and supported architectural responses; technological developments, such as the computer and the photocopier as well as new materials; and new disciplines such as cybernetics and systems theory, that influenced how issues were philosophically investigated, for example, in the concept of "open work" in art (as the <italic>arte programmata</italic> movement), in architecture and urbanism (which considered newly designed, prefabricated components as an open system that could produce a megastructure-scaled project), and in new architecture (on the scale of territory). This dissertation considers how technofilia had its critics and consequences in the visionary response to a crisis in postwar Italy, and prompts us to think more deeply about our current technological reverie.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectArchitectural Prefabricationen_US
dc.subjectArte Programmataen_US
dc.subjectBruno Zevien_US
dc.subjectItalian postwar architectureen_US
dc.subjectRinaldo Seminoen_US
dc.subjectSystems Theoryen_US
dc.subject.classificationArchitectureen_US
dc.subject.classificationArt historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationEuropean studiesen_US
dc.titleAlternate Organics: The aesthetics of experimentation in art, technology & architecture in postwar Italyen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2018-06-05en_US
Appears in Collections:Architecture

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Imperiale_princeton_0181D_10979.pdf6.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.