Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vd66w0041
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWildberg, Christianen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirois, Martinen_US
dc.contributor.otherClassics Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-26T17:10:20Z-
dc.date.available2014-03-26T17:10:20Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vd66w0041-
dc.description.abstractIn recent decades Cynicism has enjoyed a rebirth of scholarly attention. This dissertation pursues ongoing research on early Cynicism with a conscious focus on its literary nature. This research helps identifying directions and establishing guidelines for future research on the creation of the early Cynic tradition. The dissertation examines characteristic features of the literary tradition mainly through the study of biographical elements taken from the life of Diogenes the Cynic, the pragmatic philosopher known as the founding figure of the Cynic movement in 4th-c. Greece. Armed with Diogenes Laertius' account of the Cynic's life this study aims at uncovering the historical factors for the emergence of the kunikos tropos and investigating the philosophical indebtedness of Diogenes' philosophy to the previous generations of the 5th-c. sophists, as well as the influence of earlier cultural and literary models in the understanding of the Cynic character. By underlining important parallels with the tradition of (Plato's) Socrates the dissertation generally attempts to rehabilitate the tradition of the early Cynics and show that the suspicions regarding the historicity of Diogenes' words and deeds need to be tempered. The first part of the dissertation investigates the actual tradition and begins with the ancient Succession (diadoche) that links Socrates, Antisthenes, and his supposed pupil Diogenes. The study then moves to an analysis of Diogenes Laertius, a most significant source on Cynicism, and his use of earlier (lost) accounts of Diogenes' philosophy: one particular aspect of early accounts is the crucial tradition of anecdotes (chreiai and apophthegmata). The next chapter finally surveys the historical truth behind the life and death of the man from Sinope and looks into how and when he became known as `the Dog' in Classical Athens. The second part of the dissertation focuses on Diogenes the Cynic's indebtedness to previous thinkers in creating his own philosophical "character" at play in the intended tradition. This part then carefully analyzes sophistic ideas that inhabit Diogenes' world and looks into cultural and literary models that help understand and shape the character of Diogenes in his own literary tradition.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectCharacteren_US
dc.subjectCynicism (Greek)en_US
dc.subjectDiogenesen_US
dc.subjectd. ca. 323 B.C.en_US
dc.subjectIntellectual History (Athens)en_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectAncienten_US
dc.subject.classificationClassical studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.classificationHistoryen_US
dc.titleThe Early Cynic Tradition: Shaping Diogenes' Characteren_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Classics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sirois_princeton_0181D_10886.pdf1.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.