Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01v979v588p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorStilz, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorSamuels, Iris-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T14:31:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-26T14:31:19Z-
dc.date.created2019-04-02-
dc.date.issued2019-06-26-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01v979v588p-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, numerous developed states have sought to transfer the responsibility of hosting refugees to developed states through bilateral agreements. Many of these so-called third country policies have been subject to criticism, for failing to adequately protect the rights of refugees. At the same time, there is a growing body of literature that seeks to distribute global responsibility for refugee protection more fairly among the world’s countries. In this thesis, I examine agreements made by Israel, the European Union and Italy, in order to highlight similarities between bilateral agreements, and market-based global burden sharing of refugee protection. I argue that a market-based quota system could act as an expansion of third country policies, leading to a feasible proposal for global refugee burden sharing that is aligned with states interests.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleExpanding Safe Third Countries: A Global Approach to Refugee Protectionen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2019en_US
pu.departmentPoliticsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid960876751-
pu.certificateProgram in Values and Public Lifeen_US
Appears in Collections:Politics, 1927-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SAMUELS-IRIS-THESIS.pdf2.17 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.