Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01v692t8523
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGul, Faruken_US
dc.contributor.authorRavid, Doronen_US
dc.contributor.otherEconomics Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-23T19:42:36Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-23T19:42:36Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01v692t8523-
dc.description.abstractThis collection of essays investigates the effects of limited attention on economic outcomes. Chapter 1 studies a random choice procedure which I call Focus, Then Compare. First, the agent focuses on an option at random from the choice set. Then, she compares the focal option to each other alternative in the set. Comparisons are binary, random and independent of each other. The agent chooses the focal option if and only if it passes all comparisons favorably. Otherwise, the agent draws a new focal option with replacement. I characterize the revealed preference implications of the procedure, and show that it can accommodate a range of experimental findings, including the Attraction effect, Compromise effect and Choice overload. I then show that the procedure can approximate some deterministic models used in the literature to explain violations of utility maximization. Chapter 1 was presented at the “Decision - Theory, Experiments, and Applications 2012” conference. Chapter 2 studies a one-sided offers bargaining game in which a fully rational seller is making repeated offers to a rationally inattentive buyer (Sims, 2003). The good's quality is random and is known to the seller. The buyer needs to pay attention to both the quality of the good and the seller's offers. I show that the buyer attains half of the uncertain portion of the surplus as attention costs become negligible and offers are frequent. With infrequent offers the equilibrium involves the buyer paying more for, but also obtaining a higher surplus from, higher quality goods. Trade occurs with delay that is decreasing with the quality of the good and persists even when offers are frequent. Finally, I show that revealing the quality of the good to the buyer reduces both the buyer's surplus and overall efficiency.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectAttentionen_US
dc.subjectBargainingen_US
dc.subjectBounded Rationalityen_US
dc.subjectChoice Theoryen_US
dc.subjectInattentionen_US
dc.subjectRandom Choiceen_US
dc.subject.classificationEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.classificationEconomic theoryen_US
dc.titleEssays on Attention in Economicsen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ravid_princeton_0181D_11373.pdf975.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.