Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01v405s9562
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorTienda, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Elizabeth-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-11T18:14:43Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-11T18:14:43Z-
dc.date.created2014-04-11-
dc.date.issued2014-07-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01v405s9562-
dc.description.abstractAlthough there has been considerable research examining the framing of obesity in news media, there has been little exploration of how political affiliation shapes obesity discourse. Sociological research has found a relationship between political affiliation and attitudes toward social problems, such as that surrounding poverty. This thesis employs a content analysis of articles from Alternet.org, Time, and The National Review to investigate whether news sources with political bias frame obesity differently than mainstream sources. This analysis suggests that liberal sources frame obesity differently than mainstream and conservative sources by framing obesity primarily in terms of its structural causes.en_US
dc.format.extent59 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleBattle of the Bulge: Ideology and the Framing of Obesity in News Media, 2007-2013en_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2014en_US
pu.departmentSociologyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Sociology, 1954-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Wagner_Elizabeth.pdf494.34 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.