Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01th83m166k
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Burgess, John P. | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Harman, Gilbert H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, Jake | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-29T14:54:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-29T14:54:10Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2015-03-30 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06-29 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01th83m166k | - |
dc.description.abstract | In my thesis I examine three preeminent theories of humor. They are the Superiority Theory, Incongruity Theory and Relief Theory. Ultimately I find that devising one theory that correctly identifies the essence of humor is incredibly difficult because humor is not a category of phenomena but a lens through which an individual views phenomena. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 37 pages | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | PHILOSOPHY OF HUMOR | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2015 | en_US |
pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
PUTheses2015-Taylor_Jake.pdf | 474.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.