Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01tb09j788j
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWachtel, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorStrudler, Jasonen_US
dc.contributor.otherSlavic Languages and Literatures Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-25T22:42:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-25T05:08:43Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01tb09j788j-
dc.description.abstractIn the early twentieth century, many avant-gardists became convinced that traditional art had run its course, and they viewed themselves as being on the verge of discovering a new aesthetics. Such discussions came to revolve around the mathematical concept of zero, which was theorized by Andrei Bely, Aleksei Kruchenykh, Kazimir Malevich, Daniil Kharms and others as a meeting point between the old and the new. My project traces the development of this concept in poetry, prose and the visual arts. It focuses on the years between Bely's first writings on zero (1902) and the death of Malevich (1935), who theorized a "zero of forms" out of which the art of the future would emerge. In my study, I take on new interpretations of the figures discussed above, examining the different ways in which the Russian Avant-Garde sought artistic potential in nullification and used zero as a metaphor for both total destruction and creation ex nihilo. In my first chapter, I situate zero in its broader cultural context, discussing works by Vladimir Mayakovsky, Kornei Chukovsky and Vasilisk Gnedov, who saw zero as a threshold between the culture of the past and that of the future. In my second chapter, I turn to Bely and his idea of the "terror of zero," a simultaneous experience of all of culture and its total negation that informs numerous works from his third symphony (1902) to his novel Petersburg (1913-14). My third chapter centers on Kruchenykh, who argued that the new art should retain the form of zero rather than go beyond it, and came to view zaum' poetry as an aesthetic of zero, which he interpreted as non-resolution. My last chapter traces Malevich's lifelong engagement with zero; focusing on the Black Square (1915) and other Suprematist paintings, I show how the artist's turn to abstraction represented an attempt to find a place for the self in absolute nihilism. In my conclusion, I examine works by Kharms, Nikolai Oleinikov and the Nichevoki group to trace the transition to an absurdist zero in the early Soviet period.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectavant-gardeen_US
dc.subjectBelyen_US
dc.subjectKruchenykhen_US
dc.subjectMalevichen_US
dc.subjectmodernismen_US
dc.subjectRussiaen_US
dc.subject.classificationSlavic literatureen_US
dc.subject.classificationSlavic studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationArt historyen_US
dc.titleMathematical Rebellion. Zero in the Russian Avant-Gardeen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2016-09-25en_US
Appears in Collections:Slavic Languages and Literatures

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Strudler_princeton_0181D_11110.pdf1.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.