Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01t722hc25n
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorNotterman, Daniel A.-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Sophie-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-08T14:58:22Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-08T14:58:22Z-
dc.date.created2016-04-22-
dc.date.issued2016-07-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01t722hc25n-
dc.description.abstractAdvances made in noninvasive prenatal testing from fetal sex detection to whole genome sequencing hold the potential to induce a seismic shift in the landscape of genomic information, amplifying existing ethical and social concerns. Currently, conversations about uses of noninvasive prenatal testing as well as imaginings of its future largely exclude the voice of the public. This comprehensive exploratory study utilizes both qualitative and quantitative data to explore the public’s interactions with noninvasive prenatal testing. I argue that members of the public should be brought on as stakeholders in dialogues regarding NIPT’s future, because they can reveal key insights about NIPT’s development and inform new directions for policymakers and healthcare providers.en_US
dc.format.extent171 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleTo Test or Not to Test? That is (Not the Only) Question: Public Attitudes towards Noninvasive Prenatal Testingen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentMolecular Biologyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Molecular Biology, 1954-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Peeking Through the Bars: Comparing Conceptualizations of Carcerality and Criminality in German and American Picture Books1.69 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.