Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01t148fk59x
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorFrick, Johann-
dc.contributor.advisorBeitz, Charles-
dc.contributor.authorHallermeier, Johannes-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T13:15:47Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-20T13:15:47Z-
dc.date.created2016-03-31-
dc.date.issued2016-07-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01t148fk59x-
dc.description.abstractIn politics, economic migrants are considered fundamentally different from refugees: while the latter deserve admission to foreign countries, the former can be turned away. I am arguing that this is mistaken: the same arguments why somebody deserves admission apply to both. In particular, I am investigating the arguments from mutual aid and from causal responsibility.en_US
dc.format.extent56 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleREFUGEES AND ECONOMIC MIGRANTS: TWO GROUPS WITH SIMILAR CLAIMS TO BE ADMITTED TO FOREIGN COUNTRIESen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
LICENSE376.85 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.