Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01s4655g57s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCard, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:30:08Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:30:08Z-
dc.date.issued1986-08-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Labor Economics, 6, April 1988en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01s4655g57s-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents evidence on two aspects of strike activity associated with the renegotiation of union contracts: the effects of contract characteristics on dispute probabilities; and the variation in strike activity over tine within bargaining pairs. Cross-sectional and longitudinal estimation techniques show that strike probabilities are higher in summer and fall than winter and spring. Strike probabilities are also increased by increasing the length of time between negotiations, and reduced in limited wage reopening negotiations. Finally, strike probabilities are significantly affected by lagged strike out- comes. Relative to a peaceful settlement of the previous contract, strike probabilities are l0 percentage points higher following a strike of two weeks or less, and 5 to 7 percentage points lower following a strike of longer than two weeks.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 213en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0734-306X%28198804%296%3A2%3C147%3ALAOSA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7en_US
dc.subjectstrikesen_US
dc.subjectlongitudinal analysisen_US
dc.subjectstate dependenceen_US
dc.titleLongitudinal Analysis of Strike Activityen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
213.pdf3.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.