Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01rr171x21p
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Richburg Hayes, Lashawn | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-26T01:44:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-26T01:44:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1999-09-01T00:00:00Z | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 23 (June 2000) 127-152 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01rr171x21p | - |
dc.description.abstract | Despite earlier evidence to the contrary, recent inquiries appear to reach a consensus that the poor pay more for food. However, these studies utilize samples drawn on the basis of prior knowledge of unfair pricing strategies, proximity of volunteer surveyors, or other non-random methods. This paper revisits the issue of price discrimination by analyzing price data collected using a stratified, random sample design to answer the question of whether prices are higher in poor, urban neighborhoods. Contrary to the recent literature, I find that market prices in poor neighborhoods are not higher than those in more affluent areas. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 423 | en_US |
dc.subject | imperfect competition | en_US |
dc.subject | price differential | en_US |
dc.subject | supermarket | en_US |
dc.subject | urban poor | en_US |
dc.title | Are Prices Higher For the Poor in New York City? | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
pu.projectgrantnumber | 360-2050 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
423revised.pdf | 2.5 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.