Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01rr171x21p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRichburg Hayes, Lashawnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:44:09Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:44:09Z-
dc.date.issued1999-09-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Consumer Policy, vol. 23 (June 2000) 127-152en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01rr171x21p-
dc.description.abstractDespite earlier evidence to the contrary, recent inquiries appear to reach a consensus that the poor pay more for food. However, these studies utilize samples drawn on the basis of prior knowledge of unfair pricing strategies, proximity of volunteer surveyors, or other non-random methods. This paper revisits the issue of price discrimination by analyzing price data collected using a stratified, random sample design to answer the question of whether prices are higher in poor, urban neighborhoods. Contrary to the recent literature, I find that market prices in poor neighborhoods are not higher than those in more affluent areas.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 423en_US
dc.subjectimperfect competitionen_US
dc.subjectprice differentialen_US
dc.subjectsupermarketen_US
dc.subjecturban pooren_US
dc.titleAre Prices Higher For the Poor in New York City?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
423revised.pdf2.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.