Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01qr46r324p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGoldberg, Adele-
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Danielle-
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-28T14:10:48Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-28T14:10:48Z-
dc.date.created2016-04-
dc.date.issued2016-06-28-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01qr46r324p-
dc.description.abstractOne verb can be used to convey a variety of actions, and using a verb in a specific syntactic structure provides information about the verb’s sense that gives the sentence overall meaning. This research sought to determine how changing the sense of a verb, by using it in a caused-motion construction, would affect people’s perception of the verb’s meaning in isolation. The experiment consisted of similarity judgments between a pair of verbs and comparing those ratings to a similarity judgment of the same verb pair with one verb used in a cause-motion sentence. The results indicated that verb meaning remains stable even when the verb’s context shifts.en_US
dc.format.extent54 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleDo Verbs in Motion Stay in Motion? The stability of verb meanings across sentential contexten_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentPsychologyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Psychology, 1930-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Thesis_-_Danielle_Ellis.pdf712.27 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.