Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01q811kn07qFull metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Kment, Boris | - |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Elga, Adam | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Patton, Jess | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-20T13:12:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-07-20T13:12:42Z | - |
| dc.date.created | 2016-03-28 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-07-20 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01q811kn07q | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Searle believes that the Chinese room argument has shown that the instantiation of a program is never sufficient for understanding in any machine. Searle is wrong and it is logically possible that understanding can be reached through the instantiation of a program on certain machines that have minimal causal power. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 32 pages | * |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.title | Physicalism, Searle, and the Chinese Room | en_US |
| dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
| pu.date.classyear | 2016 | en_US |
| pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
| pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORIGINAL | 373.2 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.