Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01nc580m66w
Title: | The Carnegie Conjecture: Some Empirical Evidence |
Authors: | Holtz-Eakin, Douglas Joulfaian, David Rosen, Harvey |
Keywords: | inheritance estate labor supply |
Issue Date: | 1-Mar-1992 |
Citation: | The Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1993 |
Series/Report no.: | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 302 |
Abstract: | This paper examines tax return-generated data on the labor force behavior of people before and after they receive inheritances. The results are consistent with Andrew Camegie’s century-old assertion that large inheritances decrease a person's labor force participation. For example, a single person who receives an inheritance of about $150,000 is roughly four times more likely to leave the labor force than a person with an inheritance below $25,000. Additional, albeit weaker, evidence suggests that large inheritances depress labor supply, even when participation is unaltered. |
URI: | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01nc580m66w |
Related resource: | http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0033-5533%28199305%29108%3A2%3C413%3ATCCSEE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z |
Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
302.pdf | 2.23 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.