Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01m039k723k
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorFara, Delia G.-
dc.contributor.advisorHarman, Gilbert H.-
dc.contributor.authorDworsky, David-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-29T13:47:52Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-29T13:47:52Z-
dc.date.created2015-03-30-
dc.date.issued2015-06-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01m039k723k-
dc.description.abstractW.V. Quine’s Epistemology Naturalized (1969) has elicited a wide range of interpretations and reactions, and it is also seen as an important early form of “naturalism.” One common interpretation is that Quine was attempting to strip epistemology of its normative components. Modern day “naturalists” must indeed face the question whether normative dialogue is acceptable in a naturalistic framework. In this paper I defend Quine’s epistemological views, and argue that his version of naturalism did not renounce normativity.en_US
dc.format.extent45 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleA Defense of Quinean Epistemologyen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2015en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PUTheses2015-Dworsky_David.pdf383.72 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.