Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01k643b400d
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAshenfelter, Orley C-
dc.contributor.authorShearon, Shelby-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-12T12:57:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-12T12:57:40Z-
dc.date.created2019-04-05-
dc.date.issued2019-07-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01k643b400d-
dc.description.abstractEconomists posit that zoning generally has exclusionary effects. Planners, politicians, and economists claim that the newest trend in zoning, form-based zoning, does not have the same exclusionary effects that result from traditional zoning codes. Miami was the first city to implement a comprehensive form-based zoning code, the Miami 21 Zoning Code, and it serves as the foundation of this paper’s examination of form-based zoning’s exclusionary effects. I use the American Community Survey’s 1- year and 5-year estimates in an interrupted time-series model to study the impact of Miami 21. I look at Miami’s trends in key demographic statistics over time, and I also compare Miami to the control cities of Atlanta, Tampa, and Los Angeles. The results show evidence of income-related trends that mirror the exclusionary trends in cities with traditional zoning codes. However, race-based exclusionary effects of the new zoning code are not clear.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Form-Based Zoning: An Analysis of Miami 21en_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2019en_US
pu.departmentEconomicsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid961088228-
Appears in Collections:Economics, 1927-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SHEARON-SHELBY-THESIS.pdf423.36 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.