Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01jm214p26m
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRodgers, Daniel T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRegev, Ronnyen_US
dc.contributor.otherHistory Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-16T17:25:29Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-16T05:10:04Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01jm214p26m-
dc.description.abstractDuring the first half of the twentieth century, as cinema transformed from a novice form of technology to a full-fledged industry, the major production companies in the United States were forced to reconcile a rationalized profit seeking operation with a dependence on artistic imagination. In that sense, they were far from a conventional assembly line and required a unique mode of production. This dissertation examines the distinctive apparatus that developed in the motion picture business and how it shaped the film industry and its labor force during the golden age of the Hollywood studio system, c. 1920-1950. It is a study of the American motion picture industry as a modern system of labor, which reveals the day-to-day reality behind the screen and the effect work relations and politics had on cinematic production and content. I argue that beyond the cinematic text, the Hollywood workforce and its production practices are equally important to our understanding of America's foremost cultural industry. The project has two main concerns. First, it charts the splitting of expertise that took place as filmmaking went from being an unstructured practice produced in an informal work environment to a well thought-out operation with function-specific divisions and tasks. Second, it fleshes out the specialized roles created by the system by studying the experience of the practitioners who carried primary responsibility for the creative content of the movies. Hence, this dissertation is also a social history of Hollywood's creative class. Drawing from personal papers, correspondence, oral histories, trade papers, and studio files it examines the work routines of producers, writers, directors, and actors, how the people occupying these positions perceived their roles, what demands and constraints were placed on them by the system, and how they learned to negotiate their own artistic and material interests with those of the studios and with other practitioners. While paying attention to the complexity of the workforce and the different groups operating within it, the dissertation also emphasizes the commonalities and shared perceptions that fostered a sense of unity and conformity in Hollywood and helped preserve organizational harmony and stability.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectCreative Industriesen_US
dc.subjectFilmen_US
dc.subjectHollywooden_US
dc.subjectLabor Relationsen_US
dc.subjectMotion Picturesen_US
dc.subjectStudio Systemen_US
dc.subject.classificationHistoryen_US
dc.subject.classificationAmerican historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationAmerican studiesen_US
dc.title"It's a Creative Business": The Ideas, Practices, and Interaction that made the Hollywood Studio Systemen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2015-09-16en_US
Appears in Collections:History

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Regev_princeton_0181D_10625.pdf10.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.