Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j9602077x
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCook, Michael A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSzilagyi, Krisztinaen_US
dc.contributor.otherNear Eastern Studies Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05T19:44:59Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-05T05:10:47Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j9602077x-
dc.description.abstractThe central thesis of this dissertation is that the anti-Islamic literature of Christians living under Muslim rule generally drew on the contemporaneous Muslim Tradition and seldom stemmed, contrary to what has often been claimed, from their ignorance or misunderstanding of Islam. The first chapter demonstrates the validity of this thesis when applied to Christian narratives of Muhammad's death recorded in the ninth century--narratives that scholars have for centuries regarded as examples of the malicious inventiveness of Christian polemicists. The next two chapters discuss questions arising from the thesis: If Christian authors merely retold Muslim material, how did it function as polemic? And why do we find only faint traces of it in the Muslim Tradition today? In answer to the first question, the second chapter scrutinizes how the narratives were likely to have been understood by their medieval Christian readers and argues that for Christians they amounted not only to an unfavorable comparison of Muhammad with Christ and late antique holy men, but also to an implicit denial of his future bodily resurrection. The answer to the second question lies in the formative influence of Christian critique on the Muslim Tradition. The relentless Christian polemic in the first two centuries of Islam made Muslims adapt, among other things, their narratives of Muhammad's death to the religious world of Christianity. The third chapter examines the vestiges that the conflicts surrounding this makeover left in Muslim literature. The last chapter takes a birds' eye view of the reception of the Christian narratives of Muhammad's death. It explains their disappearance from medieval eastern Christian writings after the ninth century, tracks the new lease of life they received in western Christendom in the twelfth century, and clarifies the circumstances of their eventual rejection by early modern Orientalists in favor of the classical Muslim hagiography of Muhammad. The dissertation concludes with the outline of a new paradigm for the interpretation of medieval non-Muslim literary images of Islam that reflects their roots in the Christianity of the Islamic world.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subject.classificationNear Eastern studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationMiddle Eastern studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationIslamic cultureen_US
dc.titleAfter the Prophet's Death: Christian-Muslim Polemic and the Literary Images of Muhammaden_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2016-06-05en_US
Appears in Collections:Near Eastern Studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Szilagyi_princeton_0181D_10908.pdf2 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.