Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01hq37vq90q
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRamsay, Kristopher-
dc.contributor.authorMacDonald, Michael Steven-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-02T18:22:35Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-02T18:22:35Z-
dc.date.created2015-04-09-
dc.date.issued2015-07-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01hq37vq90q-
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to extend the game theoretical model presented In The Wartime President: Executive Influence and Nationalizing Politics of Threat. According to the model, war increases the prioritization of national outcomes relative to local outcomes. In effect, legislators compile voting records that more closely reflect the ideology of the president. As a component of this argument, the Policy Priority Model argues that legislators should be responsive to shifts in local issue saliency as well. This paper identifies and analyzes two such cases. However, no evidence in support of the PPM is elicited. As a result, the validity of the model is called into question.en_US
dc.format.extent90 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleTHE POLICY PRIORITY MODEL REVISITED: A NEW EMPIRICAL TEST OF ISSUE SALIENCYen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2015en_US
pu.departmentPoliticsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Politics, 1927-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PUTheses2015-MacDonald_Michael_Steven.pdf938.96 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.