Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01hd76s270m
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMcGeer, Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorKunkel, George-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-25T13:09:37Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-25T13:09:37Z-
dc.date.created2017-04-12-
dc.date.issued2017-4-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01hd76s270m-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I explore moral blame at the interpersonal level. I attempt to show how a certain one-sidedness has pervaded many account of blame, focusing solely on the person blaming at the expense of the perspective of the person being blamed. In doing so, I argue for the relative benefits of dialogical accounts of blame.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleSTARTING THE CONVERSATION: WHEN, WHY, AND HOW WE BLAMEen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2017en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid960873195-
pu.contributor.advisorid960020611-
pu.certificateProgram in Values and Public Lifeen_US
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
kunkel_george.pdf266.14 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.