Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01h702q8590
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDiMaggio, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Karen Elinor Conwayen_US
dc.contributor.otherSociology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-25T22:40:16Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-25T05:08:43Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01h702q8590-
dc.description.abstractRules of all types are increasingly enforced by digital mechanisms. Technological enforcement regimes appeal to policymakers, in part, because machines can enforce rules more perfectly than humans do; human enforcement is "messier" due to the discretion, incentives, and biases of both enforcers and enforcees. Technological rule enforcement appears to shrink the gap between rule and practice by minimizing the human element and compelling compliance. But I posit that technological enforcement regimes relocate and reshape, rather than close, gaps between on-the-books rules and on-the-ground practices. New gaps between rules and practices open up as new sites of social contestation are created, new parties are brought into negotiation with one another, and the interests of existing stakeholders are resituated. This dissertation explores these dynamics in the context of new regulations that would mandate that truck drivers' work time be electronically monitored--rather than recorded on easily falsified paper logs, as they have been for decades--to induce compliance with hours-of-service limitations. My analysis considers how legal rules and technical capacities interact to create surveillant regimes that transcend public/private distinctions, realign institutional interests, and challenge occupational identities. I consider how communities of interest--law enforcement, trucking firms, and truckers themselves--respond to digital monitoring "in the wild." I find that interaction with these systems constructs new spaces between regulatory intention and social practice, provides new tools for managerial and legal control, and reconfigures industrial and law enforcement relationships. The case offers an instructive context in which to investigate the interplay of social organization, legal rules, and technical capabilities. This research helps us conceptualize how enforcement and regulation may be reframed when technological solutions are relied upon to exact compliance with rules. As technological enforcement mechanisms come to pervade many experiences of daily life, it becomes imperative to examine how these regimes emerge and interact with the social world. Through an in-depth examination of the development and operation of an electronic monitoring device in one legal and organizational context, this dissertation aims to contribute to broad social debates about the role of technological surveillance in legal rulemaking and social life.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjectsurveillanceen_US
dc.subjecttechnologyen_US
dc.subjecttruck driversen_US
dc.subject.classificationSociologyen_US
dc.titleThe Automation of Compliance: Techno-Legal Regulation in the United States Trucking Industryen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2016-09-25en_US
Appears in Collections:Sociology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Levy_princeton_0181D_11093.pdf16.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.