Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gt54kn18r
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorAllen, Lesley-
dc.contributor.advisorHambrick, James-
dc.contributor.authorWibberley, Emily-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-03T19:57:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-03T19:57:35Z-
dc.date.created2014-04-
dc.date.issued2014-07-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gt54kn18r-
dc.description.abstractThis study sought to assess the role of moral obligation in bystanders’ willingness to report threats of school shooting violence. Participants completed a survey depicting several school shooter threat scenarios and threat statements and rated their willingness to report the threat to a peer and to an authority figure on the bases of moral obligation, social norms and moral foundations. Ultimately, the results showed support for the claim that feelings of moral obligation can predict whether someone will report a threat to an authority figure, whereas social norms predict whether someone will report to a peer. Additionally, how much participants valued the ingroup and loyalty was correlated with reporting to an authority figure, whereas value of fairness and reciprocity was correlated with reporting to a peer.en_US
dc.format.extent124 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titlePreventing School Shootings: The Relationship between Bystanders’ Attitudes and Their Willingness to Report Threatsen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2014en_US
pu.departmentPsychologyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Psychology, 1930-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Wibberley_Emily.pdf737.41 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.