Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gm80hv36s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorJi, Hantaoen_US
dc.contributor.advisorYamada, Masaakien_US
dc.contributor.authorDorfman, Seth E.en_US
dc.contributor.otherPlasma Physics Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-29T18:03:50Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-29T18:03:50Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gm80hv36s-
dc.description.abstractFast, impulsive reconnection is commonly observed in laboratory, space and astrophysical plasmas. Many existing models of reconnection attempt to explain this behavior without including variation in the third direction. However, the impulsive reconnection events observed on the Magnetic Reconnection Experiment (MRX) which are described in this dissertation cannot be explained by 2-D models and are therefore fundamentally three-dimensional. These events include both a slow buildup phase and a fast current layer disruption phase. The buildup phase is characterized by a slow transition from collisional to collisionless reconnection and the formation of “flux rope” structures; these “flux ropes” are defined as 3-D high current density regions associated with an O point at the measurement location. In the disruption phase, the “flux ropes” are ejected from the reconnection layer as the total current drops and the reconnection rate spikes. Strong out-of-plane gradients in both the density and reconnecting magnetic field are another key feature of disruptive discharges; after finite upstream density is depleted by reconnection during the buildup phase, the out of plane magnetic field gradient flattens and this disruption spreads in the electron flow direction. Electromagnetic fluctuations in the lower hybrid frequency range are observed to peak at the disruption time; however, they are not the key physics responsible for the impulsive phenomena observed. Important features of the disruption dynamics cannot be explained by an anomalous resistivity model. Furthermore, an important discrepancy in the layer width and force balance between the collisionless regime of MRX and kinetic simulations persists when the fluctuations are small or absent, implying that they are not the cause of the wider electron layers observed in the experiment. These wider layers may instead be due to the formation of flux ropes with a wide range of sizes; consistent with this hypothesis, flux rope signatures are observed down to the smallest scales resolved by the diagnostics. Finally, a 3-D two-fluid model is proposed to explain how the observed out-of-plane variation may lead to a localized region of enhanced reconnection that spreads in the direction of electron flow.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectbasic plasma physicsen_US
dc.subjectlaboratory plasma astrophysicsen_US
dc.subjectmagnetic reconnectionen_US
dc.subjectnon-magnetohydrodynamic effectsen_US
dc.subjectplasma waves and instabilitiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationPlasma physicsen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.classificationAstrophysicsen_US
dc.titleExperimental Study of 3-D, Impulsive Reconnection Events in a Laboratory Plasmaen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Plasma Physics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dorfman_princeton_0181D_10120.pdf41.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.