Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01fq977x71s
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Lederman, Harvey | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kalsi, Jaspreet | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-22T17:43:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-22T17:43:04Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-05-04 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-07-22 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01fq977x71s | - |
dc.description.abstract | The tetralemma is a logical tool used by Buddhist philosophers. It contains four elusive alternatives, the natures of which have been debated for 2000+ years. I describe many proposed forms of the tetralemma and point out flaws in them. I then present my own form that utilizes the conventional and ultimate distinction to solve the aforementioned problems. Finally, I connect my form to the novel reading I propose of Nagarjuna called “Ontological Expressivism.” | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | Shulman_Jacob.pdf | en_US |
dc.title | Cracking the Tetralemma: Extant Literature, Ultimate and Conventional Truth, and Nagarjuna’s Ontological Expressivism | en_US |
dc.title | Shulman_Jacob.pdf | en_US |
dc.title | Shulman_Jacob.pdf | en_US |
dc.title | LICENSE | - |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2020 | en_US |
pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
pu.contributor.authorid | 961266351 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
KALSI-JASPREET-THESIS.pdf | 311.91 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.