Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01f1881k89j
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrueger, Alan B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:29:23Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:29:23Z-
dc.date.issued1999-01-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationThe American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Eleventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May, 1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01f1881k89j-
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers conceptual and practical issues that arise in measuring labor's share of national income. Most importantly: How are workers defined? How is compensation defined? The current definition of labor compensation used by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) includes the salary of business owners and payments to retired workers in labor compensation. An alternative series to the BEA's standard series is presented. In addition, a simple method for decomposing labor compensation into a component due to "raw labor" and a component due to human capital is presented. Raw labor's share of national income is estimated using Census and CPS data. The share of national income attributable to raw labor increased from 9.6 percent to 13 percent between 1939 and 1959, remained at 12-13 percent between 1959 and 1979, and then fell to 5 percent by 1996.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 413en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28199905%2989%3A2%3C45%3AMLS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Zen_US
dc.titleMeasuring Labor's Shareen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
413.pdf1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.