Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01dr26z074n
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRudloff, Birgit-
dc.contributor.authorHoffenberg, Andrew-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-29T14:24:34Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-29T14:24:34Z-
dc.date.created2015-04-13-
dc.date.issued2015-07-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01dr26z074n-
dc.description.abstractInstead of focusing on traditional mean-variance optimization, portfolio managers should emphasize risk measures that focus on downside deviations. In this document, I examine three risk measures in particular: the Sharpe ratio, the Sortino ratio, and the Ulcer Performance Index. These three measure the risk-adjusted return of a portfolio, however each uses a different measure of risk. My objective is to examine how each measure performs in different market scenarios: longterm, short-term, and recessionary. Through optimization techniques and sensitivity analysis, I conclude that the Sortino ratio functions as a better measure of risk than the Sharpe ratio and Ulcer Performance Index.en_US
dc.format.extent67 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleEfficient Portfolio Allocation and Risk Management Techniquesen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2015en_US
pu.departmentOperations Research and Financial Engineeringen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Operations Research and Financial Engineering, 2000-2019

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PUTheses2015-Hoffenberg_Andrew.pdf1.33 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.