Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01br86b602n
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDeem, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorBlair, Kelsey-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-14T19:09:01Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-14T19:09:01Z-
dc.date.created2016-04-05-
dc.date.issued2016-07-14-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01br86b602n-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis seeks to investigate both the basis of rape culture in academic theory as well as its impact on the outcome of collegiate sexual assault investigations by university administrators and law enforcement offcials. We view this from a new perspective, exploring the ways in which the attitudes and assumptions that comprise rape culture influence the decision-making of institutional figures who claim objectivity in their adjudication process. Understanding the way rape culture and institutions interact in this way clears a path for an approach to rape prevention that focuses on accountability and consequence for perpetrators by redressing the misconceptions and biases of the figures of authority who impose these measures.en_US
dc.format.extent77 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.title"Blurred Lines": Rape Culture and Institutional Decision-Makingen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentPrinceton School of Public and International Affairsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, 1929-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
LICENSE478.81 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.