Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01bn9996871
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFoster, Halen_US
dc.contributor.authorFilipovic, Elenaen_US
dc.contributor.otherArt and Archaeology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-06T14:15:37Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-30T09:06:02Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01bn9996871-
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on a series of fugitive operations (or what I am calling “activities”) that Marcel Duchamp (1887–1968) incited in order to test, theorize, position, and even make his work as such· Not conventionally “artistic” in nature, even if intimately connected to the collection, presentation, reception, and valuation of art, these activities include Duchamp's role as administrator, archivist, art advisor, curator, publicist, reproduction-maker, and salesman of his own oeuvre· Rather than merely procedural, auxiliary, or incidental, they might be thought of as constitutive, resulting in a still understudied but profoundly influential output by an artist who redefined so much of what, hence forth, would be called art· Here, those most iconic of Duchamp’s inventions, the readymades, although not the central objects of this study, are understood as significant insofar as they were not simply “nominated” to become artworks, but more importantly, because they were <italics>curated</italics>· It is precisely through curatorial operations—relative to much of Duchamp's production, and constituting one of the central activities that this dissertation explores—that the artist rendered the discourse, institutions, marketing, and presentational strategies of art into something like his cardinal “medium·” Tracing Duchamp’s perennial relationship to photography, reproduction, the museum, and the archive, and spanning the period between 1913 and 1969, three chapters closely examine a number of undeniably material things: chapter one considers the artist's boxes of photographically replicated notes, the <italics>Box of 1914 </italics> (1913-14) and <italics>Boite verte </italics> (1934); chapter two examines documentation of ephemeral exhibitions, recording Duchamp’s curatorial interventions as well as suitcases filled with miniature reproductions, the Boite-en-valise (1938–42); and chapter three is dedicated to a permanent installation, <italics>Etant donnés 1· la chute d’eau, 2· le gaz d’éclairage</italics> (1946–66)· However, the premise of this dissertation is that all of these gain a new significance if studied in relation to the elusive activities that actually constituted them as artworks· Together, they formed a counter-conception of the role of the artist, articulating—and complicating—the conceptual stakes of much of what is known of his practice and thickening into what Walter Benjamin called the artist's “theory of the work of art·”en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectartist as curatoren_US
dc.subjectBoîte-en-valiseen_US
dc.subjectEtant donnésen_US
dc.subjectexhibition historyen_US
dc.subjectMarcel Duchampen_US
dc.subjectreproductionen_US
dc.subject.classificationArt historyen_US
dc.titleThe Apparently Marginal Activities of Marcel Duchampen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2017-11-30en_US
Appears in Collections:Art and Archaeology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Filipovic_princeton_0181D_10804.pdf2.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.