Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01bk128d78n
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMas, Alexandre-
dc.contributor.authorPallais, Amanda-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-02T16:33:03Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-02T16:33:03Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01bk128d78n-
dc.description.abstractAlternative work arrangements, defined both by working conditions and by workers’ relationship to their employers, are heterogeneous and common in the U.S. This article reviews the literature on workers’ preferences over these arrangements, inputs to firms’ decision to offer them, and the impact of regulation. It also highlights several descriptive facts. Work arrangements have been relatively stable over the past 20 years, work conditions vary substantially with education, and jobs with schedule or location flexibility are less family-friendly on average. This last fact helps explain why women are not more likely to have schedule or location flexibility and seem to largely reduce hours to get more family-friendly arrangements.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries634-
dc.titleAlternative Work Arrangementsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
634.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.