Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01b5644r54h
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ashenfelter, Orley | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-26T01:45:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-26T01:45:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1987-02-01T00:00:00Z | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 2, May 1987 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01b5644r54h | - |
dc.description.abstract | Arbitration systems are often used to resolve labor disputes because on-going employment relationships are likely to contain specific (human capital) investments. Recent research indicates that the ex ante acceptability of arbitration to the parties must depend, in part, on the unpredictability of the arbitrator's award. It is shown that the usual selection process for arbitrators does imply that arbitrator decisions should be statistically exchangeable (in the limit), and the evidence available to date supports this hypothesis. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 219 | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28198705%2977%3A2%3C342%3AAB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V | en_US |
dc.subject | arbitration | en_US |
dc.title | Arbitrator Behavior | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
pu.projectgrantnumber | 360-2050 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
219.pdf | 828.44 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.