Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01b5644r54h
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAshenfelter, Orleyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:45:13Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:45:13Z-
dc.date.issued1987-02-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 2, May 1987en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01b5644r54h-
dc.description.abstractArbitration systems are often used to resolve labor disputes because on-going employment relationships are likely to contain specific (human capital) investments. Recent research indicates that the ex ante acceptability of arbitration to the parties must depend, in part, on the unpredictability of the arbitrator's award. It is shown that the usual selection process for arbitrators does imply that arbitrator decisions should be statistically exchangeable (in the limit), and the evidence available to date supports this hypothesis.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 219en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28198705%2977%3A2%3C342%3AAB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Ven_US
dc.subjectarbitrationen_US
dc.titleArbitrator Behavioren_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
219.pdf828.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.