Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019880vq97s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKasper, Hirschelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:29:23Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:29:23Z-
dc.date.issued1986-08-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019880vq97s-
dc.description.abstractThis short paper discusses some aspects of the recent increase in the number of full-time non—tenure track faculty appointments. It considers alternative explanations for the growth and concludes that the predominant cause seems to be that institutions have elected to offer non—tenure track appointments, not that they are forced to by inadequate finances or projections of declines in student enrollment. This tentative conclusion rests on some statistics which imply that tenure track appointments tend to be offered more frequently in fields where there is also more upward pressure on salaries and where new faculty appointments may have a wider choice of alternatives.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 211en_US
dc.subjectlabor marketsen_US
dc.subjectwage structureen_US
dc.subjectcollege and university facultyen_US
dc.subjecttenureen_US
dc.titleOn Understanding the Rise in Non-Tenure Track Appointmentsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
211.pdf927.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.