Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp018s45q892n
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Hanioglu, Sukru | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Akarca, Halit Dundar | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Near Eastern Studies Department | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-05T19:45:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-05T19:45:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp018s45q892n | - |
dc.description.abstract | During the First World War, the Russian Caucasian Army had occupied a territory comprising the Ottoman provinces of Trabzon, Erzurum, Van, and, for a shorter period, Bitlis. The region that the Russian forces occupied was depopulated to a great extent due to the deportation and the massacres of the Armenian population and the flight of the Muslims. In the course of the occupation, however, mainly Armenian but also a significant number of Muslim refugees returned to the region. The relative absence of resistance and inter-communal violence during the occupation is striking, given the violent periods immediately before and after the occupation. Concentrating on the Russian practice of power during the occupation period, I will try to provide one plausible reason from among many: namely, that the Russian state and society succeeded in projecting a functioning vision of empire for the occupied regions. The Ottoman state and the Russian state were empires in modern times. Both employed methods to enhance the status of their state in the international arena. The Ottoman state was not on a track to establish a nation-state. Its rulers' attempts to institutionalize an "Ottomanist" nationalism failed, paving the way for modern methods of increasing the homogeneity of the empire, including population deportation or ethnic cleansing. Had the Ottoman state successfully ended the war, it would exist as an empire. In reality, however, the Ottoman Empire disintegrated into nation-states which all condemned their imperial past and which were all ruled by the late Ottoman elites who had embraced nationalist ideas and identities. The Russian imperial territories and structure, on the other hand, remained almost intact with most of the imperial bureaucracy merely serving under a new banner. The analysis of the Russian rule in the occupied Ottoman territories provides new insights for the viability of imperial political entities. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Princeton, NJ : Princeton University | en_US |
dc.relation.isformatof | The Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a> | en_US |
dc.subject | Archaeology | en_US |
dc.subject | Armenia | en_US |
dc.subject | Caucasus | en_US |
dc.subject | First World War | en_US |
dc.subject | Ottoman Empire | en_US |
dc.subject | Russian Empire | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | History | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Middle Eastern history | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Russian history | en_US |
dc.title | IMPERIAL FORMATIONS IN OCCUPIED LANDS: THE RUSSIAN OCCUPATION OF OTTOMAN TERRITORIES DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR | en_US |
dc.type | Academic dissertations (Ph.D.) | en_US |
pu.projectgrantnumber | 690-2143 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Near Eastern Studies |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Akarca_princeton_0181D_11022.pdf | 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.