Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp018336h193z
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFelten, Edward Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorClarkson, William Banksen_US
dc.contributor.otherComputer Science Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-01T19:35:29Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-01T19:35:29Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp018336h193z-
dc.description.abstractIntuitively, we understand that physical items are distinct --- we are able to pick up and manipulate them. Yet, we often treat similar items as if they are indistinguishable from one another. Undue reliance on the assumption that seemingly identical items can be treated as if they are identical can lead to unintended, negative consequences. Conversely, the ability to distinguish between seemingly identical objects often enables new applications. This thesis examines three artifacts that carry with them false assumptions about their indistinguishability: blank sheets of paper, `anonymous' bubble forms, and loudspeakers. Blank sheets of paper, e.g. those in a ream of copy paper, are often treated as if they are identical to one another. We develop a new method to identify sheets of paper by measuring their inherently unique surface texture using commodity equipment. This permits a number of applications, e.g. counterfeit currency detection, and has important implications for paper-based elections, which are discussed in detail. Next, we turn to optical-scan bubble-forms which often rely on the assumption that they do not reveal the respondent's identity. We demonstrate that individuals tend to mark bubbles in distinctive ways, unintentionally conveying their identity. This has important implications for anonymous surveys and the publication of completed ballots after an election. We describe a number of mitigation techniques and procedural changes to limit the risk of accidentally revealing identifying information. The final artifact, loudspeakers, are increasingly ubiquitous devices designed to accurately reproduce an audio signal. It is commonly assumed that multiple instances of `identical' loudspeakers will generate the same output given identical inputs. This assumption is false. We demonstrate that individual loudspeakers, even those of the same make and model, induce unique distortions on the generated sound, identifying the individual loudspeaker. We develop methods to identify loudspeakers, enabling a new method of device authentication. By examining the common underlying assumptions of each artifact, we develop a common methodology used in identifying distinguishing features. This general framework is successfully applied to each artifact, suggesting that other seemingly identical objects may become distinguishable in the future.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectanonymousen_US
dc.subjectcomputer securityen_US
dc.subjectfingerprinten_US
dc.subjectidentificationen_US
dc.subjectprivacyen_US
dc.subjectsensoren_US
dc.subject.classificationComputer scienceen_US
dc.titleBreaking Assumptions: Distinguishing Between Seemingly Identical Items Using Cheap Sensorsen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Computer Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Clarkson_princeton_0181D_10155.pdf31.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.