Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0179407x33q
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGoldani, Ana Maria-
dc.contributor.authorMardones, Viviana-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-11T17:51:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-11T17:51:16Z-
dc.date.created2014-04-11-
dc.date.issued2014-07-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0179407x33q-
dc.description.abstractArgentina was the first Latin American country to legalize same-sex marriage in spite of the Catholic Church’s opposition. However, abortion remains illegal in all cases except those of rape and of risk to health or life of the mother. This study investigates why abortion legislation has not been liberalized in Argentina despite strong international pressure to do so. The Catholic Church has historically held much influence in Latin America, and Pope Francis is Argentinean. The main hypothesis, then, was that the continued illegality was due to this institution’s influence. I analyzed the discourse of seven pro-choice and eight pro-life Argentinean activists and found that this was not the case. Rather, the human rights movement seems to have a stronger influence than religion on both sides of the debate. Further research will have to be conducted to determine if this result is generalizable.en_US
dc.format.extent100 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleABORTION LEGISLATION IN ARGENTINA: A STUDY OF DISCOURSE IN PRO-LIFE AND PRO-CHOICE ACTIVIST GROUPSen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2014en_US
pu.departmentSociologyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Sociology, 1954-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Mardones_Viviana.pdf908.04 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.