Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp016682x409j
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLord, Graham-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Franklin-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-02T17:07:29Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-02T17:07:29Z-
dc.date.created2014-04-15-
dc.date.issued2014-07-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp016682x409j-
dc.description.abstractThe excessively high credit ratings given to securitized products like CDOs and MBS are among the many purported causes of the 2008 financial crisis. The proportion of securitized products given AA to AAA ratings was far higher than the amount given to corporate bonds. Due to the sheer degree of upward ratings bias and the sensitivity of these products to changes in collateral assets, these assets proved volatile and prone to “rating reversals”. We find that these reversals (sudden changes in rating trend within a 12-month period) act primarily to re-upgrade speculative-grade or recently downgraded bonds. This tendency was found in both pre-crisis and post-crisis time periods, and intensified after 2008. It occurs independently of and counteracts the overall drop in securitized products’ credit ratings. This increased rating volatility, as evidenced by the frequency of these reversals despite alterations to rating distribution after 2007, suggests that credit ratings are a poor metric of risk for these products.en_US
dc.format.extent48 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleCredit Rating Reversals in Securitized Products and Corporate Bondsen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2014en_US
pu.departmentEconomicsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Economics, 1927-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Zhao_Frank.pdf881.76 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.