Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp016682x408w
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPagels, Elaineen_US
dc.contributor.authorJorgensen, David Williamen_US
dc.contributor.otherReligion Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05T19:44:22Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-05T05:10:45Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp016682x408w-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is an integrated reception history of one of the early church's foundational documents, the Gospel according to Matthew. The project eschews traditional constructions of the boundaries of the church along retrospectively orthodox and heretical lines, in favor of a model that imagines the second- and third-century church engaged in a struggle for the right to assert the label of orthodoxy. From this point of view, what would eventually become the center cannot be adequately understood without attending to groups and individuals that were later depicted by the ecclesiastical authorities as always having been on the margins. Therefore, this study shows how in the second and third centuries, the Valentinians were important contributors to a shared culture of early Christian exegesis of shared foundational documents. The dissertation examines the use of Matthew's Gospel in the Valentinian texts the Gospel of Truth, Interpretation of Knowledge, and Ptolemy's Epistle to Flora, as well as Irenaeus' Against the Heresies, Tertullian's Prescription Against Heretics, and the Stromata of Clement of Alexandria. This approach illuminates a number of aspects of the history of the early church. I argue for a critical reevaluation of the false dichotomy between "orthodox" and "heretical" exegetical method, showing how Valentinian and patristic authors often apply the same innovative reading strategies to the same scriptural passages. I further argue that Valentinian exegetes made their own, unique contributions to what would become Christian orthodoxy, in two areas in particular: the application of allegorical interpretation to the New Testament, and a complex explanation of the historical and theological relationship between Judaism and Christianity. The project additionally deepens our knowledge of Irenaeus' grasp of Greco-Roman rhetoric, and of Valentinian cosmogonic speculation. As the first monograph-length study of Valentinian exegesis of the Gospel of Matthew, it contributes to recent scholarship on Valentinian ethics and ecclesiology, matters with which Matthew's Gospel was particularly concerned. Finally, the project enriches our understanding of the process by which the Gospel of Matthew came to be thought of as Scripture, and thus put on the path to eventual canonization within the New Testament.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectexegesisen_US
dc.subjectMatthewen_US
dc.subjectNew Testamenten_US
dc.subjectparablesen_US
dc.subjectpatristicsen_US
dc.subjectValentiniansen_US
dc.subject.classificationReligionen_US
dc.subject.classificationBiblical studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationReligious historyen_US
dc.titleTreasure Hidden in a Field: Early Christian Exegesis of the Gospel of Matthewen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2016-06-05en_US
Appears in Collections:Religion

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jorgensen_princeton_0181D_10948.pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.