Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015t34sj761
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Pretorius, Frans | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Tromp, Jeroen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, Shanna | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-23T15:32:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-23T15:32:11Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-05 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-07-23 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015t34sj761 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Full waveform inversion (FWI) is a method of seismic tomographic inversion based on modeling the entire wave eld to extract information. This allows for the inversion of lower frequencies and longer o sets to produce more high quality imaging, but the non-linearity of the problem means that the computation costs can be prohibitive. A proposed method to reduce the computational cost involves combining multiple encoded source shots with different signatures into a single \supershot" for inversion. There are several key issues to be addressed with this method. Importantly, interference between sources or "cross-talk" may create unwanted noise. We examine FWI in its conventional and supershot incarnations, and test various methods of source encoding to reduce cross-talk noise. We also look at the issue of missing data in the supershot. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 63 pages | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | Source encoding in full waveform inversion: comparison of encoding schemes and misfit functions | en_US |
dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
pu.date.classyear | 2014 | en_US |
pu.department | Physics | en_US |
pu.pdf.coverpage | SeniorThesisCoverPage | - |
Appears in Collections: | Physics, 1936-2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
chu_shanna.pdf | 5.79 MB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.