Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015999n348d
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMiller, Bradley-
dc.contributor.authorPines, W. Colby-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-15T15:35:12Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-15T15:35:12Z-
dc.date.created2013-04-04-
dc.date.issued2013-07-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015999n348d-
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that appeals to rights should not be part of moral discourse, and suggests that rights talk is actually counter-productive to debate. It is argued that there are better ways to communicate substantively normative ideas without relying on the vague and/or question-begging language of rights.en_US
dc.format.extent44 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleTHE WRONGNESS OF RIGHTS: A CRITIQUE OF MODERN MORAL LANGUAGEen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2013en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
dc.rights.accessRightsWalk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the <a href=http://mudd.princeton.edu>Mudd Manuscript Library</a>.-
pu.mudd.walkinyes-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PinesColbyThesis.pdf726.89 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.