Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014t64gq554
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAdelman, Jeremyen_US
dc.contributor.authorFajardo, Maria Margaritaen_US
dc.contributor.otherHistory Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T19:49:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-30T09:12:45Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014t64gq554-
dc.description.abstractThe dissertation traces the intellectual and policy endeavors of Latin American social scientists in their efforts to explain and bring about the region’s economic development. From the planning for the postwar economic order to the global expansion of the American multinational corporation and the end of the Bretton Woods era, these social scientists, whose nexus was the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA in English and CEPAL in Spanish and Portuguese), foreground development as the transformation of the region’s relation to the world economy. In an effort to reconcile national industrialization, regional cooperation, and global economic integration and through an institution that straddled regional and global spheres, Latin American economic experts, diplomats, and policymakers advised, formulated, and implemented economic policies and in the process developed new ideas about Latin America and the global economic order. The dissertation shows how they analyzed the region through the lens of measures such as international terms of trade, balance of payments, inflation, and foreign capital investment, all of which captured the region’s relation to the global economy. It explains how these policy experiments with the finance of development led to the production of concepts such as external vulnerability, center-periphery, structural disequilibria, and dependency. Therefore, the dissertation demonstrates that global approaches and concepts emerge from the peripheries, not the centers of power. Simultaneously, it shows that a notion of Latin America as a region emerges from global, not local, networks of policymaking and expertise. Overall, the dissertation demonstrates that in Latin America, development provided the intellectual and political space to rethink and remake Latin America and its place in the global economy, with enduring implications for the social scientific apparatus still in use today to understand the region’s historical trajectory.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: http://catalog.princeton.edu/en_US
dc.subjectcenter-peripheryen_US
dc.subjectdependency theoryen_US
dc.subjectEconomic Commission for Latin America (ECLA)en_US
dc.subjecteconomic developmenten_US
dc.subjectexpertiseen_US
dc.subjectknowledgeen_US
dc.subject.classificationHistoryen_US
dc.subject.classificationLatin American historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationScience historyen_US
dc.titleThe Latin American Experience with Development: Social Sciences, Economic Policies, and the Making of a Global Order, 1944-1971en_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2019-09-30en_US
Appears in Collections:History

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fajardo_princeton_0181D_11472.pdf1.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.